Title: I Wish to Be a Medical Analyst... Any Strategies on Why I Should Be MD, MD/PhD or PhD?
Okay.. .my bit of advice is the fact that before you decide to set yourself on one of these paths perform some clinical shadowing plus some lab research.
Some definitions first....
MD: Signifies Doctor of Medicine, a doctor's qualification in medicine
PhD: Is the highest education obtained at a university or college, usually requiring 3-5 years of original study in a particular field of study.
MD/PhD: refers to an education including both the medical training of a doctor (MD or DO) with the rigor of a scientific specialist (PhD)
You can also consider to get involved in some clinical research. This can offer you a taste of the different fields. Some MDs do clinical research, if you decide to get interested in that, you would not need an MD/PhD.
You actually should gain some upfront exposure before you make any decisions. Neither clinical work nor lab bench effort is what it really might appear like in theory. You should get your hands dirty. Make an effort to check around, find out about them, and acquire a couple of tastes of each one.
I do think it's more easy to find a personality niche when you are content with the specific work you're doing daily, rather than attempt to enjoy doing work you hate, even if you fit the "typical profile" of the job.
Generally a double degree is made for those people who are interested in both, basically. However, you will possibly not wind up doing most of the actual bench work if you are an MD/PhD. The MD/PhD that's the P.I. of the testing center I currently work for NEVER does some of the actual experiments we currently do, he simply covers administrational stuff and discusses problems/ideas together with his henchmen.
All his time through the week is spent on clinical work. I am not sure this could be the way it always works, but this really is my own experience. However , if you happen to be equally interested in both, then I would still think an MD/PhD will probably be worth considering.
MD/PhD will place you at some advantage in grant-writing if you are a new researcher. (Eventually, the degree matters less because research employers assess you according to your actual accomplishments.)
Imagine that studying scientific research can be easier if you have been trained like a physician. This advantage is just not well worth the extra 3 years, but it's somewhat of an advantage. It provides the flexibleness to view patients if you'd prefer. A slight majority of the MD/PhD's I've come across tend not to, but some do and in any case each of them could. It may help out with the pursuit of an academic position too.
And you? What are your pros and cons of selecting a MD, MD/PhD or PhD profession?
Who am I ?: Sandra Ochoa is writing for the clinical research training courses blog, her personal and non-commercial in nature pastime blog to provide free suggestions for clinical research training newbie's/experts to assist them to find a new job.